Chapter 2
detailed summary tables of results

 2.1 List of integrals sorted by grade for each CAS
  2.1.1 Rubi
  2.1.2 Mathematica
  2.1.3 Maple
  2.1.4 Maxima
  2.1.5 FriCAS
  2.1.6 Sympy
  2.1.7 Giac
  2.1.8 Mupad
 2.2 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems
 2.3 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

2.1 List of integrals sorted by grade for each CAS

2.1.1 Rubi

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.2 Mathematica

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 }

B grade: { 4, 6 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.3 Maple

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.4 Maxima

A grade: { 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { 3 }

2.1.5 FriCAS

A grade: { 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 }

B grade: { 2, 4 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.6 Sympy

A grade: { 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 }

B grade: { 1 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.7 Giac

A grade: { 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 }

B grade: { 2 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.8 Mupad

A grade: { }

B grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.2 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems

Detailed conclusion table per each integral is given by table below. The elapsed time is in seconds. For failed result it is given as F(-1) if the failure was due to timeout. It is given as F(-2) if the failure was due to an exception being raised, which could indicate a bug in the system. If the failure was due to integral not being evaluated within the time limit, then it is given just an F.

In this table,the column normalized size is defined as \(\frac {\text {antiderivative leaf size}}{\text {optimal antiderivative leaf size}}\)











Problem 1 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Mupad










grade A A A A A A B A B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 40 40 23 20 23 36 116 23 23
normalized size 1 1.00 0.58 0.50 0.58 0.90 2.90 0.58 0.58
time (sec) N/A 0.007 0.012 0.006 0.498 0.761 1.391 0.885 0.348




















Problem 2 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Mupad










grade A A A A A B A B B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 24 24 24 19 35 40 19 38 18
normalized size 1 1.00 1.00 0.79 1.46 1.67 0.79 1.58 0.75
time (sec) N/A 0.018 0.011 0.005 1.405 0.723 0.147 1.068 0.461




















Problem 3 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Mupad










grade A A A A F(-2) A A A B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 42 42 41 36 0 137 144 61 38
normalized size 1 1.00 0.98 0.86 0.00 3.26 3.43 1.45 0.90
time (sec) N/A 0.042 0.033 0.021 0.000 0.838 4.297 0.826 0.588




















Problem 4 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Mupad










grade A A B A A B A A B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 15 15 34 12 15 23 10 12 11
normalized size 1 1.00 2.27 0.80 1.00 1.53 0.67 0.80 0.73
time (sec) N/A 0.013 0.019 0.052 0.566 0.756 0.263 1.130 0.081




















Problem 5 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Mupad










grade A A A A A A A A B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 21 21 39 20 29 21 19 21 11
normalized size 1 1.00 1.86 0.95 1.38 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.52
time (sec) N/A 0.012 0.017 0.057 0.552 0.701 0.273 1.088 0.409




















Problem 6 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Mupad










grade A A B A A A A A B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 12 21 26 11 15 20 8 10 10
normalized size 1 1.75 2.17 0.92 1.25 1.67 0.67 0.83 0.83
time (sec) N/A 0.011 0.033 0.055 0.585 0.668 0.434 0.953 0.359




















Problem 7 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Mupad










grade A A A A A A A A B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 43 43 24 20 23 39 42 49 21
normalized size 1 1.00 0.56 0.47 0.53 0.91 0.98 1.14 0.49
time (sec) N/A 0.040 0.027 0.053 0.980 0.487 0.522 0.936 0.048




















Problem 8 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Mupad










grade A A A A A A A A B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 30 30 31 35 34 38 32 36 28
normalized size 1 1.00 1.03 1.17 1.13 1.27 1.07 1.20 0.93
time (sec) N/A 0.013 0.005 0.021 0.423 0.753 0.178 0.856 0.398










2.3 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

The following table is specific to Rubi. It gives additional statistics for each integral. the column steps is the number of steps used by Rubi to obtain the antiderivative. The rules column is the number of unique rules used. The integrand size column is the leaf size of the integrand. Finally the ratio \(\frac {\text {number of rules}}{\text {integrand size}}\) is given. The larger this ratio is, the harder the integral was to solve. In this test, problem number [3] had the largest ratio of [.2500]

Table 2.1:Rubi specific breakdown of results for each integral














# grade
number of
steps
used
number of
unique
rules
normalized
antiderivative
leaf size
integrand
leaf size
\(\frac {\text {number of rules}}{\text {integrand leaf size}}\)







1 A 2 1 1.00 17 0.059







2 A 2 2 1.00 18 0.111







3 A 2 2 1.00 8 0.250







4 A 2 2 1.00 12 0.167







5 A 2 2 1.00 12 0.167







6 A 1 1 1.75 12 0.083







7 A 3 3 1.00 12 0.250







8 A 4 4 1.00 16 0.250