Internal
problem
ID
[10399] Book
:
Second
order
enumerated
odes Section
:
section
1 Problem
number
:
40 Date
solved
:
Tuesday, December 30, 2025 at 12:10:29 AM CAS
classification
:
[[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]
Since there is no duplication between the basis
function in the UC_set and the basis functions of the homogeneous solution, the trial
solution is a linear combination of all the basis in the UC_set.
\[
y_p = A_{2} x +A_{1}
\]
The unknowns \(\{A_{1}, A_{2}\}\) are found
by substituting the above trial solution \(y_p\) into the ODE and comparing coefficients.
Substituting the trial solution into the ODE and simplifying gives
\[
A_{2} x +A_{1} = 1+x
\]
Solving for the
unknowns by comparing coefficients results in
\[ [A_{1} = 1, A_{2} = 1] \]
Substituting the above back in the
above trial solution \(y_p\), gives the particular solution
Equation (7) is now solved. After finding \(z(x)\) then \(y\) is found using the inverse transformation
\begin{align*} y &= z \left (x \right ) e^{-\int \frac {B}{2 A} \,dx} \end{align*}
The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases
depending on the order of poles of \(r\) and the order of \(r\) at \(\infty \). The following table summarizes these
cases.
Need to have at least one pole
that is either order \(2\) or odd order
greater than \(2\). Any other pole order
is allowed as long as the above
condition is satisfied. Hence the
following set of pole orders are all
allowed. \(\{1,2\}\),\(\{1,3\}\),\(\{2\}\),\(\{3\}\),\(\{3,4\}\),\(\{1,2,5\}\).
no condition
3
\(\left \{ 1,2\right \} \)
\(\left \{ 2,3,4,5,6,7,\cdots \right \} \)
Table 2.25: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case
The order of \(r\) at \(\infty \) is the degree of \(t\) minus the degree of \(s\). Therefore
There are no poles in \(r\). Therefore the set of poles \(\Gamma \) is empty. Since there is no odd order pole larger
than \(2\) and the order at \(\infty \) is \(0\) then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Therefore
\begin{align*} L &= [1] \end{align*}
Since \(r = -1\) is not a function of \(x\), then there is no need run Kovacic algorithm to obtain a
solution for transformed ode \(z''=r z\) as one solution is
\[ z_1(x) = \cos \left (x \right ) \]
Using the above, the solution for the
original ode can now be found. The first solution to the original ode in \(y\) is found from
Since there is no duplication between the basis
function in the UC_set and the basis functions of the homogeneous solution, the trial
solution is a linear combination of all the basis in the UC_set.
\[
y_p = A_{2} x +A_{1}
\]
The unknowns \(\{A_{1}, A_{2}\}\) are found
by substituting the above trial solution \(y_p\) into the ODE and comparing coefficients.
Substituting the trial solution into the ODE and simplifying gives
\[
A_{2} x +A_{1} = 1+x
\]
Solving for the
unknowns by comparing coefficients results in
\[ [A_{1} = 1, A_{2} = 1] \]
Substituting the above back in the
above trial solution \(y_p\), gives the particular solution
Methodsfor second order ODEs:---Trying classification methods ---tryinga quadraturetryinghigh order exact linear fully integrabletryingdifferential order: 2; linear nonhomogeneous with symmetry [0,1]tryinga double symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)]->Try solving first the homogeneous part of the ODEchecking if the LODE has constant coefficients<- constant coefficients successful<-solving first the homogeneous part of the ODE successful