2.3.14 Problem 14
Internal
problem
ID
[13294]
Book
:
Handbook
of
exact
solutions
for
ordinary
differential
equations.
By
Polyanin
and
Zaitsev.
Second
edition
Section
:
Chapter
1,
section
1.2.
Riccati
Equation.
subsection
1.2.3.
Equations
Containing
Exponential
Functions
Problem
number
:
14
Date
solved
:
Wednesday, December 31, 2025 at 01:01:59 PM
CAS
classification
:
[_Riccati]
2.3.14.1 Solved using first_order_ode_riccati
10.822 (sec)
Entering first order ode riccati solver
\begin{align*}
y^{\prime }&=-\lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x} y^{2}+a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x} y-a \,{\mathrm e}^{\left (\mu -\lambda \right ) x} \\
\end{align*}
In canonical form the ODE is \begin{align*} y' &= F(x,y)\\ &= -\lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x} y^{2}+a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x} y-a \,{\mathrm e}^{\left (\mu -\lambda \right ) x} \end{align*}
This is a Riccati ODE. Comparing the ODE to solve
\[
y' = \textit {the\_rhs}
\]
With Riccati ODE standard form \[ y' = f_0(x)+ f_1(x)y+f_2(x)y^{2} \]
Shows
that \(f_0(x)=-a \,{\mathrm e}^{-\lambda x} {\mathrm e}^{\mu x}\), \(f_1(x)={\mathrm e}^{\mu x} a\) and \(f_2(x)=-\lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}\). Let \begin{align*} y &= \frac {-u'}{f_2 u} \\ &= \frac {-u'}{-u \lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}} \tag {1} \end{align*}
Using the above substitution in the given ODE results (after some simplification) in a second
order ODE to solve for \(u(x)\) which is
\begin{align*} f_2 u''(x) -\left ( f_2' + f_1 f_2 \right ) u'(x) + f_2^2 f_0 u(x) &= 0 \tag {2} \end{align*}
But
\begin{align*} f_2' &=-\lambda ^{2} {\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}\\ f_1 f_2 &=-{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x} a \lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}\\ f_2^2 f_0 &=-\lambda ^{2} {\mathrm e}^{\lambda x} a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x} \end{align*}
Substituting the above terms back in equation (2) gives
\[
-\lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x} u^{\prime \prime }\left (x \right )-\left (-\lambda ^{2} {\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}-{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x} a \lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}\right ) u^{\prime }\left (x \right )-\lambda ^{2} {\mathrm e}^{\lambda x} a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x} u \left (x \right ) = 0
\]
Unable to solve. Will ask Maple to solve
this ode now.
The solution for \(u \left (x \right )\) is
\begin{equation}
\tag{3} u \left (x \right ) = c_1 \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}+c_2 \operatorname {hypergeom}\left (\left [-\frac {\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \left [\frac {\mu -\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \frac {a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right )
\end{equation}
Taking derivative gives \begin{equation}
\tag{4} u^{\prime }\left (x \right ) = c_1 \lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}-\frac {c_2 \lambda \operatorname {hypergeom}\left (\left [1-\frac {\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \left [\frac {\mu -\lambda }{\mu }+1\right ], \frac {a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right ) {\mathrm e}^{\mu x} a}{\mu -\lambda }
\end{equation}
Substituting equations (3,4) into (1) results in \begin{align*}
y &= \frac {-u'}{f_2 u} \\
y &= \frac {-u'}{-u \lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}} \\
y &= \frac {\left (c_1 \lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}-\frac {c_2 \lambda \operatorname {hypergeom}\left (\left [1-\frac {\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \left [\frac {\mu -\lambda }{\mu }+1\right ], \frac {a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right ) {\mathrm e}^{\mu x} a}{\mu -\lambda }\right ) {\mathrm e}^{-\lambda x}}{\lambda \left (c_1 \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}+c_2 \operatorname {hypergeom}\left (\left [-\frac {\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \left [\frac {\mu -\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \frac {a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right )\right )} \\
\end{align*}
Doing change of constants, the above solution becomes \[
y = \frac {\left (\lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}-\frac {c_3 \lambda \operatorname {hypergeom}\left (\left [1-\frac {\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \left [\frac {\mu -\lambda }{\mu }+1\right ], \frac {a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right ) {\mathrm e}^{\mu x} a}{\mu -\lambda }\right ) {\mathrm e}^{-\lambda x}}{\lambda \left ({\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}+c_3 \operatorname {hypergeom}\left (\left [-\frac {\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \left [\frac {\mu -\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \frac {a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right )\right )}
\]
Simplifying the above gives
\begin{align*}
y &= \frac {\operatorname {hypergeom}\left (\left [\frac {\mu -\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \left [\frac {-\lambda +2 \mu }{\mu }\right ], \frac {a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right ) a c_3 \,{\mathrm e}^{\left (\mu -\lambda \right ) x}+\lambda -\mu }{\left (\lambda -\mu \right ) \left ({\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}+c_3 \operatorname {hypergeom}\left (\left [-\frac {\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \left [\frac {\mu -\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \frac {a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right )\right )} \\
\end{align*}
Summary of solutions found
\begin{align*}
y &= \frac {\operatorname {hypergeom}\left (\left [\frac {\mu -\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \left [\frac {-\lambda +2 \mu }{\mu }\right ], \frac {a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right ) a c_3 \,{\mathrm e}^{\left (\mu -\lambda \right ) x}+\lambda -\mu }{\left (\lambda -\mu \right ) \left ({\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}+c_3 \operatorname {hypergeom}\left (\left [-\frac {\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \left [\frac {\mu -\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \frac {a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right )\right )} \\
\end{align*}
2.3.14.2 ✓ Maple. Time used: 0.002 (sec). Leaf size: 96
ode:=diff(y(x),x) = -lambda*exp(lambda*x)*y(x)^2+a*exp(mu*x)*y(x)-a*exp((mu-lambda)*x);
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
\[
y = \frac {a c_1 \,{\mathrm e}^{\left (\mu -\lambda \right ) x} \operatorname {hypergeom}\left (\left [\frac {\mu -\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \left [\frac {-\lambda +2 \mu }{\mu }\right ], \frac {a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right )+\lambda -\mu }{\left (-\mu +\lambda \right ) \left (c_1 \operatorname {hypergeom}\left (\left [-\frac {\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \left [\frac {\mu -\lambda }{\mu }\right ], \frac {a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right )+{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x}\right )}
\]
Maple trace
Methods for first order ODEs:
--- Trying classification methods ---
trying a quadrature
trying 1st order linear
trying Bernoulli
trying separable
trying inverse linear
trying homogeneous types:
trying Chini
differential order: 1; looking for linear symmetries
trying exact
Looking for potential symmetries
trying Riccati
trying Riccati sub-methods:
trying Riccati_symmetries
trying Riccati to 2nd Order
-> Calling odsolve with the ODE, diff(diff(y(x),x),x) = (a*exp(mu*x)+lambda)
*diff(y(x),x)-lambda*exp(lambda*x)*a*exp(-lambda*x+mu*x)*y(x), y(x)
*** Sublevel 2 ***
Methods for second order ODEs:
--- Trying classification methods ---
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)]
checking if the LODE is missing y
-> Heun: Equivalence to the GHE or one of its 4 confluent cases under a \
power @ Moebius
-> trying a solution of the form r0(x) * Y + r1(x) * Y where Y = exp(int\
(r(x), dx)) * 2F1([a1, a2], [b1], f)
-> Trying changes of variables to rationalize or make the ODE simpler
trying a quadrature
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients
checking if the LODE is of Euler type
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)]
checking if the LODE is missing y
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm
A Liouvillian solution exists
Reducible group (found an exponential solution)
Group is reducible, not completely reducible
Solution has integrals. Trying a special function solution free of \
integrals...
-> Trying a solution in terms of special functions:
-> Bessel
-> elliptic
-> Legendre
<- Kummer successful
<- special function solution successful
Solution using Kummer functions still has integrals. Trying a hy\
pergeometric solution.
-> hyper3: Equivalence to 2F1, 1F1 or 0F1 under a power @ Moebi\
us
<- hyper3 successful: received ODE is equivalent to the 1F1 ODE
-> Trying to convert hypergeometric functions to elementary form\
...
<- elementary form could result into a too large expression - re\
turning special function form of solution, free of uncomputed integrals
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
Change of variables used:
[x = ln(t)/mu]
Linear ODE actually solved:
lambda*a*u(t)+(-a*mu*t-lambda*mu+mu^2)*diff(u(t),t)+mu^2*t*diff(dif\
f(u(t),t),t) = 0
<- change of variables successful
<- Riccati to 2nd Order successful
Maple step by step
\[ \begin {array}{lll} & {} & \textrm {Let's solve}\hspace {3pt} \\ {} & {} & \frac {d}{d x}y \left (x \right )=-\lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x} y \left (x \right )^{2}+a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x} y \left (x \right )-a \,{\mathrm e}^{\left (\mu -\lambda \right ) x} \\ \bullet & {} & \textrm {Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is}\hspace {3pt} 1 \\ {} & {} & \frac {d}{d x}y \left (x \right ) \\ \bullet & {} & \textrm {Solve for the highest derivative}\hspace {3pt} \\ {} & {} & \frac {d}{d x}y \left (x \right )=-\lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x} y \left (x \right )^{2}+a \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x} y \left (x \right )-a \,{\mathrm e}^{\left (\mu -\lambda \right ) x} \end {array} \]
2.3.14.3 ✓ Mathematica. Time used: 1.501 (sec). Leaf size: 165
ode=D[y[x],x]==-\[Lambda]*Exp[\[Lambda]*x]*y[x]^2+a*Exp[\[Mu]*x]*y[x]-a*Exp[(\[Mu]-\[Lambda])*x];
ic={};
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
\begin{align*} y(x)&\to \frac {e^{\lambda (-x)} \left (-\lambda \left (-\frac {a e^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right )^{\lambda /\mu } \Gamma \left (-\frac {\lambda }{\mu },-\frac {a e^{x \mu }}{\mu }\right )+\mu e^{\frac {a e^{\mu x}}{\mu }}+c_1 \lambda e^{\frac {\lambda }{\mu }+1} \left (e^{\mu x}\right )^{\lambda /\mu }\right )}{\lambda \left (-\left (-\frac {a e^{\mu x}}{\mu }\right )^{\lambda /\mu } \Gamma \left (-\frac {\lambda }{\mu },-\frac {a e^{x \mu }}{\mu }\right )+c_1 e^{\frac {\lambda }{\mu }+1} \left (e^{\mu x}\right )^{\lambda /\mu }\right )}\\ y(x)&\to e^{\lambda (-x)} \end{align*}
2.3.14.4 ✗ Sympy
from sympy import *
x = symbols("x")
a = symbols("a")
lambda_ = symbols("lambda_")
mu = symbols("mu")
y = Function("y")
ode = Eq(-a*y(x)*exp(mu*x) + a*exp(x*(-lambda_ + mu)) + lambda_*y(x)**2*exp(lambda_*x) + Derivative(y(x), x),0)
ics = {}
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
NotImplementedError : The given ODE -a*y(x)*exp(mu*x) + a*exp(-lambda_*x + mu*x) + lambda_*y(x)**2*exp(lambda_*x) + Derivative(y(x), x) cannot be solved by the factorable group method