2.35.35 Problem 35

Internal problem ID [13959]
Book : Handbook of exact solutions for ordinary differential equations. By Polyanin and Zaitsev. Second edition
Section : Chapter 2, Second-Order Differential Equations. section 2.1.3-1. Equations with exponential functions
Problem number : 35
Date solved : Friday, December 19, 2025 at 08:53:28 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

\begin{align*} y^{\prime \prime }+\left ({\mathrm e}^{x \left (\lambda +\mu \right )} a +{\mathrm e}^{\lambda x} a \lambda +b \,{\mathrm e}^{\mu x}-2 \lambda \right ) y^{\prime }+a^{2} b \lambda \,{\mathrm e}^{x \left (2 \lambda +\mu \right )} y&=0 \\ \end{align*}

2.35.35.1 ✗ Maple

ode:=diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+(a*exp((lambda+mu)*x)+a*lambda*exp(lambda*x)+b*exp(mu*x)-2*lambda)*diff(y(x),x)+a^2*b*lambda*exp((mu+2*lambda)*x)*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 

\[ \text {No solution found} \]

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Heun: Equivalence to the GHE or one of its 4 confluent cases under a power \ 
@ Moebius 
-> trying a solution of the form r0(x) * Y + r1(x) * Y where Y = exp(int(r(x),\ 
 dx)) * 2F1([a1, a2], [b1], f) 
-> Trying changes of variables to rationalize or make the ODE simpler 
<- unable to find a useful change of variables 
   trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
   trying 2nd order exact linear 
   trying symmetries linear in x and y(x) 
   trying to convert to a linear ODE with constant coefficients 
   trying 2nd order, integrating factor of the form mu(x,y) 
   trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
   checking if the LODE is missing y 
   -> Heun: Equivalence to the GHE or one of its 4 confluent cases under a pow\ 
er @ Moebius 
   -> trying a solution of the form r0(x) * Y + r1(x) * Y where Y = exp(int(r(\ 
x), dx)) * 2F1([a1, a2], [b1], f) 
   -> Trying changes of variables to rationalize or make the ODE simpler 
   <- unable to find a useful change of variables 
      trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
   trying to convert to an ODE of Bessel type 
   -> trying reduction of order to Riccati 
      trying Riccati sub-methods: 
         trying Riccati_symmetries 
         -> trying a symmetry pattern of the form [F(x)*G(y), 0] 
         -> trying a symmetry pattern of the form [0, F(x)*G(y)] 
         -> trying a symmetry pattern of the form [F(x),G(x)*y+H(x)] 
--- Trying Lie symmetry methods, 2nd order --- 
   -> Computing symmetries using: way = 3 
[0, y] 
   <- successful computation of symmetries. 
   -> Computing symmetries using: way = 5
 

2.35.35.2 ✗ Mathematica

ode=D[y[x],{x,2}]+(a*Exp[(\[Lambda]+\[Mu])*x]+a*\[Lambda]*Exp[\[Lambda]*x]+b*Exp[\[Mu]*x]-2*\[Lambda])*D[y[x],x]+(a^2*b*\[Lambda]*Exp[(2*\[Lambda]+\[Mu])*x])*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 

Not solved

2.35.35.3 ✗ Sympy

from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
a = symbols("a") 
b = symbols("b") 
c = symbols("c") 
lambda_ = symbols("lambda_") 
mu = symbols("mu") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(a**2*b*lambda_*y(x)*exp(x*(2*lambda_ + mu)) + (a*lambda_*exp(lambda_*x) + a*exp(x*(lambda_ + mu)) + b*exp(mu*x) - 2*lambda_)*Derivative(y(x), x) + Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 

False