May be you have a result of dsolve and want to plot it. For example:
Nice! It works!
But! Look at a(0), a(t-t) ! What is ”a” ? ”a” ist a procedure with a(t)=exp(t) in its remember table. Nothing more! This is not what I want. What I want, can I get by:
And now think you are in a physics course and want to explain how easy it is with maple to solve problems and come to a visualization.
Is there anybody who know what I can do instead of this map(x->map(unapply,x,t),res) ?
I am also interested in the question you raise. An awkward method that I have used in such situations is this:
\(af(t)\) and \(bf(t)\) can now be used in the usual manner.
well you could always do...
or even set up a little proc...
this has the advantage of having no side eﬀects, but of course the solutions must all depend on t.