Chapter 2
detailed summary tables of results

 2.1 List of integrals sorted by grade for each CAS
  2.1.1 Rubi
  2.1.2 Mathematica
  2.1.3 Maple
  2.1.4 Maxima
  2.1.5 FriCAS
  2.1.6 Sympy
  2.1.7 Giac
 2.2 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems
 2.3 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

2.1 List of integrals sorted by grade for each CAS

2.1.1 Rubi

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.2 Mathematica

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.3 Maple

A grade: { 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { 1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 }

2.1.4 Maxima

A grade: { 2

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 }

2.1.5 FriCAS

A grade: { 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { 1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 }

2.1.6 Sympy

A grade: { 2 }

B grade: { 3, 4 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 }

2.1.7 Giac

A grade: { 2 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 }

2.2 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems

Detailed conclusion table per each integral is given by table below. The elapsed time is in seconds. For failed result it is given as F(-1) if the failure was due to timeout. It is given as F(-2) if the failure was due to an exception being raised, which could indicate a bug in the system. If the failure was due to integral not being evaluated within the time limit, then it is given just an F.

In this table,the column normalized size is defined as \(\frac{\text{antiderivative leaf size}}{\text{optimal antiderivative leaf size}}\)










Problem 1 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F F F F
verified N/A Yes NO TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 71 71 71 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.015 0.066 0.114 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 2 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A A A A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 9 9 9 9 12 22 7 14
normalized size 1 1. 1. 1. 1.33 2.44 0.78 1.56
time (sec) N/A 0.02 0.032 0.043 1.51 2.538 1.211 1.114


















Problem 3 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A F A B F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 35 35 28 26 0 70 65 0
normalized size 1 1. 0.8 0.74 0. 2. 1.86 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.043 0.107 0.041 0. 2.38 5.073 0.


















Problem 4 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A F A B F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 58 58 38 36 0 116 155 0
normalized size 1 1. 0.66 0.62 0. 2. 2.67 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.067 0.145 0.041 0. 2.499 16.569 0.


















Problem 5 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A F A F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 27 27 25 23 0 77 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 0.93 0.85 0. 2.85 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.028 0.067 0.039 0. 2.442 0. 0.


















Problem 6 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A F A F(-1) F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 55 55 51 35 0 119 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 0.93 0.64 0. 2.16 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.059 0.162 0.04 0. 2.513 0. 0.


















Problem 7 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A F A F(-1) F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 82 82 95 45 0 161 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.16 0.55 0. 1.96 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.09 0.209 0.042 0. 2.499 0. 0.


















Problem 8 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F F F F
verified N/A Yes NO TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 147 147 89 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 0.61 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.182 0.171 0.314 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 9 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F F F F
verified N/A Yes NO TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 147 147 89 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 0.61 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.197 0.153 0.291 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 10 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F F F F
verified N/A Yes NO TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 207 207 89 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 0.43 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.235 0.164 0.297 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 11 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F F F(-1) F
verified N/A Yes NO TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 207 207 89 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 0.43 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.25 0.179 0.293 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 12 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F F F(-1) F
verified N/A Yes NO TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 272 272 100 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 0.37 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.3 0.187 0.294 0. 0. 0. 0.









2.3 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

The following table is specific to Rubi. It gives additional statistics for each integral. the column steps is the number of steps used by Rubi to obtain the antiderivative. The rules column is the number of unique rules used. The integrand size column is the leaf size of the integrand. Finally the ratio \(\frac{\text{number of rules}}{\text{integrand size}}\) is given. The larger this ratio is, the harder the integral was to solve. In this test, problem number [1] had the largest ratio of [ 0.5 ]

Table 2.1Rubi specific breakdown of results for each integral














# grade
number of
steps
used
number of
unique
rules
normalized
antiderivative
leaf size
integrand
leaf size
\(\frac{\text{number of rules}}{\text{integrand leaf size}}\)







1 A 2 2 1. 4 0.5







2 A 1 1 1. 14 0.071







3 A 2 2 1. 14 0.143







4 A 3 2 1. 14 0.143







5 A 1 1 1. 16 0.062







6 A 2 2 1. 16 0.125







7 A 3 2 1. 16 0.125







8 A 3 3 1. 23 0.13







9 A 3 3 1. 23 0.13







10 A 4 4 1. 23 0.174







11 A 4 4 1. 23 0.174







12 A 5 4 1. 23 0.174